Category Archives: Victim cases

BRING BACK BRADBURYS: to Compensate Victims of White Collar Criminals

2014 will be the 100th anniversary of the ‘Bradbury Pound‘: debt- and interest-free ‘treasury money‘ as the UK equivalent to Abraham Lincoln’s ‘greenback’ – the sane, honest and healthy alternative to ‘bank money‘: dishonest credit produced by banks from thin air.

James Gibb Stuart, author of the Money Bomb – banned from the shops in 1983 – as the ground breaking book wrote this article about the Bradburys.

The writers of the Bank of England Act 1694 knew about the power of creating money and trading with it aka usury or making money out of money – the deadly sin of riba in Islam. In 1913 the Federal Reserve followed suit. Syria and Iran are the only countries left without a Central Bank a la Anselm Rothschild:

“Give me the power to issue a nation’s money; then I do not care who makes the law.”

Continue reading

Litigants in Person – a new resource for ‘new’ victims

Becoming a victim is a devastating and baffling experience, because it does not make SENSE.

It generally implies NOT to have the money to instruct a solicitor.

And solicitors may have been part of the problem in the first place.

The only way to ‘fight back’ may therefore be as a Litigant in Person (LIP). This is a harrowing experience for many different reasons.

This blog is the result of victim experiences first hand.

News Release on behalf of Raymond Fox

Forum for Stable Currencies logo

Forum for Stable Currencies logo

Forum for Stable Currencies

Advocating Economic Democracy

through Freedom from National Debt

Convenor: Lord Sudeley FSA; Host: Lord Ahmed; Chairman: Austin Mitchell MP
Sponsors: James Gibb Stuart, Ossian Publishers; Barbara A. Panvel, New Era Coalition
Organiser: Sabine K McNeill, Director, 3D Metrics; Facilitator: Brad Meyer, Collaboration Ltd

NEWS RELEASE

28th July 2010

Homeless UK man with nuclear induced illness seeks legal redress

Despite receiving a judgement in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in his favour (2008), former successful Reading businessman, Raymond Fox did not receive compensation for the loss of his health and home, on top of having been made an “indefinite bankrupt” since 2001 for an alleged debt of £7,000.  He has now been made homeless and like many others who have been declared bankrupt/lost their properties, he intends to seek that UK law be upheld to deal with his multifaceted problems.

From 1988 to 2001 Ray Fox and his family lived in Wokingham Road, Earley, near Reading next to the alleged buried nuclear reactor on a former Shell petrochemical terminal. See Shell Buried Nuclear Bunker (part of a Mark Thomas documentary Secret Map of Britain broadcast on Channel 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWcymza2cYQ.  See also Ray Fox’s website http://rayfox.info, and Shell Nuclear Contamination broadcast on London Tonight and Suburb Poisoned by Shell Plutonium..

Having bought the Earley house in 1988, Ray Fox’s health forced him to leave it 13 years later due to the highest plutonium and uranium contamination ever recorded in Britain. It has been documented that Mr Fox is suffering from radioactivity induced illness. Since leaving the house, he lived in rented accommodation, from which Reading County Court recently evicted him and his stepson – thus making him homeless. Mr Fox and his wife had adopted the boy when he was two months old after his parents had died from nuclear induced illness.

Reading County Court had ordered the repossession of the contaminated home in Earley by Bradford & Bingley Bank, now owned by The Crown, The Crown and Shell being joint owners of the Shell site that has been under investigation by independent radiation specialists.

“It is utterly disgraceful and unacceptable in any civilised society that a man who has been so harmed by contamination of his property is unable to obtain any compensation or redress or even any sensible investigation of his serious problems which will clearly affect and must have affected many other people.” Prof Chris Busby, Scientific Sec of the European Cttee on Radiation Risk

CONTACT

Gedaljahu Ebert on 0208 905 5209, de8765@hotmail.co.uk

Sabine McNeill on 07968 039 141 or in Germany on 0049 33876 90166, email sabine@3d-metrics.com

EDITORS’ NOTES

1. On 26th September 2008,.the European Commission of Petitions Notice to Members Case No 0820/2007 by Raymond  Fox regarding damage caused by discharges of nuclear and chemical wastes and ionising radiation concluded “concerning the Petitioner’s allegations whereby his case was deliberately not correctly dealt with by the national courts and authorities…”

2. Forum for Stable Currencies campaigns to comply with the rule of law, see also https://edm1297.info/

3. Background re UK Repossessions/bankruptcy cases: see The Forensics of Legal Fraud by G Ebert and Brad Meyer

State kidnapping – another “case story”

It’s too hard to believe. You don’t want to get involved, unless you’re hit yourself.

But the document that I also published as Case 12 says it in words and on video: real people, real experiences, real suffering.

Another shocking story

This case of a man who was maimed for life when he was 14 is an appalling account of what abuse of power can get up to…

Get out of Debt Free – A Great Advice Site

Get out of Debt Free has been set up to highlight the fraudulent nature of the Global Financial System and offer solutions to those who may be experiencing financial hardship as a result of it.

It was inspired by the remarkable work of MaryElizabeth Croft whose book inspired many: How I Clobbered every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency known to Man … a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are. Her website is Spiritual EconomicsNow.net

But the really interesting suggestion is this letter from this forum post:

re “fractional reserve banking”

Hi good people. Seems like a sensible spot to drop in this idea.

Clearly part of our strength we need to recognise is that some people within the banking system are in fear of their scam being uncovered.  Understandably so, they owe us an incredible amount.

While checking through some template letters challenging banks and debt collectors and having thoughts of struggling to pay rising utility bills etc it came to mind that it may be possible to combine direct action against the banks as we are doing here, with less direct action through companies whose bills we struggle to pay.

eg

If you don’t have enough money available to pay a large bill, how about paying a reasonable sum and enclosing something like the following draft letter? It could be modified and adapted.

People who may not be inclined to take on a bank or credit card company over a loan, may be unable to pay all they owe on a utility bill, and may just be prepared to enclose something similar, especially if they are made aware of the true nature of the banking system. Perhaps as a means of easing their own fears of action against them.

If this was to happen the scale could become rather large and the status quo broken.

Clearly the thieving banking/legal system are pooping themselves worrying about their scam being exposed, maybe a letter like this one could increase the share value of toilet paper manufacturers.

Methinks also this could be an effective form of lawful rebellion. Just an idea!

DRAFT

Dear Utility Joe,

You may have noticed that we have been experiencing difficulties paying our bills recently.

We are sorry that this situation has arisen and would like to see the situation return to normal.

However, it has come to our attention since the so called banking crisis that the shortage of money in our accounts can be traced back to the immoral, unethical and fraudulent banking system and the debt based money supply, which creates the capital from nothing and extracts the interest out of our common wealth.
This being at all levels including government, business and people.

This process has been in place and hugely successful for some considerable time. So there is masses of dosh to be reclaimed. Princess David will find his job so much easier. He won’t have one.

Clearly the situation is an unacceptable and unsustainable state of affairs and one which must be dealt with as a matter of priority and urgency for our mutual benefit. The austerity cuts are not needed.

A number of monetary reform organisations have been working hard trying to resolve this matter without the awareness and therefore support of the general public. This has now changed.

Several progressive groups and organisations are joining with the reformers to support the public in creating an economic environment whereby they can reclaim the money taken and free us all from the tyranny of usury. You, too, can join if you wish. Your company will benefit.

There are a number of ways this can be achieved and new methods are being discovered on a regular basis. We are pleased to be part of this movement and look forward to the days when we can pay our bills easily without fear, worry or distress.

Meanwhile, we will pay what we can, when we can, in full knowledge that this situation has been brought about by external forces beyond our control for the time being. If you have difficulty operating your business because of a reduction in revenue, I suggest you join with other companies in a similar movement to end the idiotic regime operated by the banks using our real wealth.

If you require more information on this subject it is not difficult to find these days. you could begin by googling “fractional reserve banking” with various other key words, as countless millions of ordinary people already have done all over the earth.

Yours in anticipation of better days to come.

E S: Toppel of the family known as Humanitarious Novartis

Letter gone missing from Ministerial Box

Our letter to the Secretary of State The Rt Hon Dr. Vincent Cable MP was hand delivered by Mr Ebert on May 27. He was promised that the letter would be put in the Ministerial Box the same day.

Mr. Ebert’s is one of four cases put before Dr. Cable to rectify false bankruptcies that were obtained by producing fraudulent documentation.

The other two cases are Paulette Cooper whose property was recently repossessed following a previous bankruptcy order, and Raymond Fox who hase recently been evicted following his quest for compension for nuclear induced illness.

The fourth, David Fabb’s case, recently got a hearing that actually was considered fair, and everybody is awaiting the judgment.

OFT insolvency report reads last rites for ‘rip-off’ administrators

This article in the Telegraph on 25 June 2010 will cheer up many people who’ve suffered from corporate insolvency practitioners (IPs). But it won’t give them back what they lost.

We still need access to justice and compensation!

With thanks to Jeff Lampert whose company was made bankrupt for the wrong reasons. He wrote about the report on accounting web and publishes his own blog Mad Lemming.

Requesting Compliance with The Rule of Law on “Your Freedom”

This is what I wrote in the box “What’s your idea?” on the site that has been closed since:

Dear Coalition Government,

CONGRATULATIONS on this initiative!

You will see on our petition “Stop the Oppression of the British people” [see http://bit.ly/bVYZkd ] that its popularity has grown to over 1,100 signatures and 5,000 page views since March 2010.

The comments collated from signers on http://bit.ly/cXwkup express the Zeitgeist excellently and will tell you that self-regulation does not work.

The legal profession and the Courts’ administration need to comply with the Rule of Law. Lord Bingham summarised what the Rule of Law means here: http://bit.ly/dBN6kn.

We have written to the Lord Chancellor pointing out the abuse of Her Majesty’s seal. See http://bit.ly/az2gOj

We have written to the Ministry of State The Rt Hon Dr Vincent Cable MP about false documents being produced to create fraudulent bankruptcies. However, our hand delivered, stamped and signed letter went missing, after we were promised it would be put into the Ministerial Box the same day (May 27, 2010). See http://bit.ly/cwD2AE

As you will find from reading the comments, the time is ripe for change. Thanks for making it happen by telling your civil servants and public employees to comply with the Rule of Law!

And this in the box “Why is your idea important?”

Because white collar crime has ensured that thousands of people

1. are robbed of their homes and businesses

2. are denied Legal Aid

3. don’t get adequate representation or help

4. are treated as less than humans when they end up as “vexatious litigant” or, worse, sectioned

5. have been robbed of their pensions or industrial compensations.

Please see two of our “sample cases” with photos:

1. Paulette Cooper on https://edm1297.info/2010/06/10/illegal-repossession-documented/

2. Raymond Fox on http://bit.ly/afCee0

Council unable to house evicted Ray Fox

Hi All

Ray Fox Eviction RC Court HH Judge D Hamilton

Ray Fox Eviction RC Court HH Judge D Hamilton

Ray Fox Eviction RCCourt HH Judge D Hamilton request reasons

Ray Fox Eviction RCCourt HH Judge D Hamilton request reasons

Ray Fox Eviction Reading Council BB Temp Housing

Ray Fox Eviction Reading Council BB Temp Housing

Once again: eviction into silence. Click on the pictures to read them.

The claimant’s solicitor did not even attend, proving that the case was decided, I believe by Kenneth Clarke, in the hope to silence his requirement to sort out my bankruptcy.

He claimed he did not have the power to give me time to move out because the evil man wanted me silenced over the judicial review in the same matter refereed from the same court. What is going on? They’re playing their own game in fear, I believe, or do they have total control?

The Bailiff arrived this morning with stab jackets on. He was asked for form 66. He said he does not require one. There were 2 witnessess to what he claimed who can do an affivait. The court papers he had gives him authority, but he would not give me a copy.

Sabine was sent photos this afternoon. There was no point in having any further argument because now there will be lodged a counter claim. The claimant’s solicitor never attended has the eviction notice claimed.

EU Petitions decision P1

EU Petitions decision P1

EU Petitions decision P2

EU Petitions decision P2

EU Petitions Decision P3

EU Petitions Decision P3

These documents are amassing the evidence for a judicial review against Reading County Court – Reading Council & Wokingham Council & others.

The Council paid the rent on the flat directly to the claimant. The property was unlicensed, condemned under EHO by the same council, but they conspired with the landlord to have me evicted. Does this make sense?

Knowing they where going to do something nasty, myself and adopted son went to the Council to seek assistance in moving to a 2 bed flat. My step son has slept in the lounge for the past 3 years. The Council then claimed he should pay. But he was not working and on benefits and was ill due to nuclear illness. And he was made homeless by Wokingham Council after they had failed to protect him from plutonium and uranium being dumped in the family home via illegal drains.

The council then sent us to look at a property. It was disgusting; and then to another one, just the same. The rules are if you refuse three, the Council has fulfilled their obligation. You are homeless because you refused a home. All of them were unfurnished. We asked them how we could afford furniture on income support. They said it’s not our problem or duty. So there you have it.

I went to the Council yesterday as homeless. Was kept waiting 3 hours before we could see any one. Don’t forget we had just had an eviction judgement. So I needed to get our belongings into safety before the bailiff grabbed them. Finally at about 4.00 pm we were seen and told: You can only have BB. That’s all the Government will allow, not forgetting the Government were behind getting us evicted via a corrupt and bent judge.

I attended the Council at 2.00 PM today to be humiliated and grilled to justify getting them to pay for the BB. See last attachment. They then said you have arrears so we really are not obliged to help you,I said if you provided me with a legitimate copy of eviction form 66 which i now demand because your council payed the rent and so are a joint to the tenancy ,they did not like that ,however I agreed to consider paying if they can provide all the evidences I required

I arrived at the BB at 4-30 waited till 6-00 no one turned up we are now homeless and have had to seek sanctuary with a friend, this is state sponsored reprisal without doubt ,The heat of to day effects our health severely and if it carries on we will become very very ill ,

Ray